Security testing

IDOR testing that proves cross-account access

An Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) is when changing an identifier in a request lets you read or change data that isn't yours. Sintropyc tests for it the only way that actually works — signed in as real users, sweeping object IDs across every endpoint, and proving each hit by returning another account's data.

Run a scanTalk to us

What IDOR is

Almost every request your app makes carries an identifier: /orders/1042, ?user=88, an invoice UUID, a file key. An IDOR exists when the server trusts that identifier without checking that the person asking is allowed to have it. Increment it, swap it, or replay someone else's, and their data comes back.

Why scanners miss it, and humans are slow

A vulnerability scanner has no accounts and no idea who owns object 1042, so it cannot tell a legitimate response from a stolen one. A human tester can, but doing it by hand across every endpoint, role and object type is exactly the tedious, repetitive work people skip under time pressure. This is where an agent that never gets bored wins.

How Sintropyc tests it

Sintropyc is an autonomous AI penetration testing agent. It signs in as real users across different roles, drives your product the way a customer would, and proves every finding with a working exploit — never a scanner guess. Each finding is checked by a human before it reaches you, comes with the exact fix, and is attacked again after you ship it to confirm it held.

For IDOR it uses at least two accounts, maps every endpoint that takes an identifier, and systematically tries each account's objects from the other's session — reads and state-changing writes. A finding is only reported when account A demonstrably reaches account B's data, with the exact request and response as proof.

What you get

Common questions

Is IDOR the same as BOLA?

They're the same class. "IDOR" is the classic web term; BOLA (Broken Object Level Authorization) is the API-focused name and is number one on the OWASP API Top 10.

Do you need source code?

No — it's tested black-box against the running app. Source or a Supabase/Firebase config makes coverage deeper and faster, but isn't required.

Will it change real users' data?

Write tests use benign, reversible markers and run only where safe; anything destructive needs your explicit sign-off. Proof is the smallest safe effect.

See it proven on your own app

One fixed price. A full test, every finding proven with a working exploit, the exact fix, and a retest after you ship.